tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30250385.post913284776318507874..comments2007-12-30T10:30:52.187-04:00Roger Bansemerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13588747562397370909noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30250385.post-58115586638661291932007-12-30T02:28:00.000-04:002007-12-30T02:28:00.000-04:00GORGEOUS!The Epiphany Artisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08682492613728814449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30250385.post-13663745598102566532007-06-15T21:43:00.000-04:002007-06-15T21:43:00.000-04:00Hi,<BR/>I was thinking about this matter the other day.<BR/>But i was thinking to myselfe: "I do need some detail, otherwise the painting evolves no sense of reality?"<BR/>I thought about it by looking at some plain air painters who presume it's enough to leave a bold brush stoke of color, assuming it will do for "reality".<BR/> But i know what u talk about and its always better (as far as I think) to get the atmosphere and colors right, before one can elaborate the details.<BR/><BR/>www.dwienand.de<BR/>btw: if u have any tips for my painints, dont hesitate to let me know :)D.Wienandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01435321301946420575noreply@blogger.com