tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30250385.post7694823936148580579..comments2023-11-22T04:53:49.875-04:00Comments on Thoughts on Painting and Art: A question of worthAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13588747562397370909noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30250385.post-17261699752293025012012-01-31T21:18:26.331-04:002012-01-31T21:18:26.331-04:00Wrong... it could increase in value. It has absolu...Wrong... it could increase in value. It has absolutely nothing to do with the painting itself. It's an investment. Nobody with $75K to throw around really cares about the painting. Art is often a safer way to invest than the stock market.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30250385.post-73188180169735158522012-01-31T16:42:48.808-04:002012-01-31T16:42:48.808-04:00$75,000? Really? For that amount imagine how many ...$75,000? Really? For that amount imagine how many "real" pieces of art you could buy. What a joke. I wouldn't pay .75 for it. ~GaryGary Dombrowskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09595511328277618342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30250385.post-18916299947809601832012-01-16T13:39:33.878-04:002012-01-16T13:39:33.878-04:00I saw that broadcast. What a joke, poor sucker th...I saw that broadcast. What a joke, poor sucker that does pay 75,000 for it. Its just a example of how a NY Dealer created a artificial market. Has nothing to do with quality art. Sad but a lot of that is created by dealers to bring in dollars to their pockets.Kurthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12637059930577742407noreply@blogger.com